SEVASTOPOL IN GUIDEBOOKS OF THE NINETEENTH AND TWENTIETH CENTURIES: URBAN SPACE BETWEEN MEMORY, WAR, AND THE TOURIST NARRATIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/mics2026.01.161Keywords:
Sevastopol, guidebooks, military urbanism, politics of memory, symbolic geography, urban narrativesAbstract
This study examines Sevastopol as an urban space in which military experience and narratives of heroism shaped urban identity, spatial organization, and cultural memory. The object of analysis is a corpus of guidebooks published between 1857 and 1969. The central research question addresses how the spatial traces of war—bastions, ruins, and memorial sites—combined with heroic myths, were reinterpreted within tourist and cultural narratives that ultimately formed the symbolic geography of Sevastopol.
The theoretical framework draws on concepts of military urbanism (Stephen Graham; Eyal Weizman), lieux de mémoire (Pierre Nora), politics of memory (Aleida and Jan Assmann), and symbolic geography. Methodologically, the study employs content analysis, narrative and discourse analysis of textual and visual materials, as well as a comparative approach that allows for tracing continuity between imperial and Soviet narrative regimes.
The comparative analysis of guidebooks and their narrative structures demonstrates a transformation in the image of Sevastopol—from a “city of ruins” and a symbol of sacrifice in the nineteenth century to a canonical “hero city” in the Soviet period. Guidebooks functioned not merely as sources of information for travelers but as instruments of ideological construction of urban space, where memory, myth, and tourism were closely intertwined. The study highlights the role of cultural texts in shaping memory politics and in producing the symbolic space of urban landscapes.
References
“A theory of the politics of memory”. In Twenty Years After Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration, eds. J. Kubik and M. Bernhard, 7–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Afanas’ev, D. Putevoditel’ po Sevastopoliu, ego bastionam i okrestnostiam, izdannyi s tsel’iu blagotvoreniia na ego razvalinakh. Mykolaiv: Tipografiia Chernomorskogo gidrograficheskogo depo, 1857.
Assmann, A. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Assmann, J. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Baranov, A., E. Garmashova, T. Lopatina, & D. Punga. “Regional Features, Patterns and Experience of the Economic Life of the City of Sevastopol in the Second Half of the 19th – early 20th Centuries.” Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University 14, no 5 (February 1, 2025): 134–162. https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-5-134-162.
Bernsand, Niklas, and Barbara Törnquist-Plewa, eds. Cultural and Political Imaginaries in Putin’s Russia. Brill, 2019. http://doi.org/10.1163/9789004366671.
Boym, S. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books, 2011.
Crane, S. Museums and Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
de Certeau, M. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Dysa, K. “Obraz modernoho mista u putivnykakh po Kyievu mezhi XIX–XX st.” In Zhyvuchy v modernomu misti: Kyiv kintsia XIX — seredyny XX stolit, eds. O. Betliy, K. Dysa and O. Martyniuk, 82–95. Kyiv: Dukh i litera, 2016.
Fedor, J., M. Kangaspuro, J. Lassila, & T. Zhurzhenko, eds. War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
Garmash, P. Sevastopol’: ocherk-putevoditel’. 2nd rev. and enl. ed. Simferopol, Crimea, 1969.
Graham, S. “When Life Itself is War: On the Urbanization of Military and Security Doctrine”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36, no 1 (February 23, 2011): 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01026.x.
Hromenko, S. #KrymNash. Istoriia rosiyskoho mify. Kyiv: Khimdzhest, 2017.
Kharitonenko, P., and N. Golubov, eds. Sevastopol’ v 1855–1856 g.: 25 fototipicheskikh snimkov s redkogo fotograficheskogo al’boma. Moscow: Tipo-litografiia T-va I. N. Kushnerev i Kº, 1893.
Kirschenblatt-Gimblett, B. Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.
Kizlova, A. “Kyiv Institute for Noble Maidens in the Guidebooks (19th — early 20th centuries).” Kyiv Historical Studies 12, no 1 (2021): 123–133. https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2021.114.
Kostiv, O. “‘The Other’, Official History, and Memory of the City in Soviet Guidebooks to Chernivtsi.” City: History, Culture, Society 15 (1): 87–104. https://doi.org/10.15407/mics2023.01.087.
Lennon, J., & M. Foley. Dark tourism: The attraction of death and disaster. London: Continuum, 2000.
Livanov, V., ed. Sevastopol’ do Krymskoi voiny i posle onoi: istoricheskoe opisanie, sostavlennoe i izdannoe dlia puteshestvennikov. Moscow: Tipografiia Skoropechatni Pletneva, Znamenskogo, Bazunova per., i I. Panteleeva, 1874.
Markov, E. Ocherki Kryma: kartiny krymskoi zhizni, prirody i istorii. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo M. O. Vol’f, 1884.
Moskvich, G. Illiustrirovannyi prakticheskii putevoditel’ po Sevastopoliu i okrestnostiam. 17th ed. Odessa, 1909.
Nora, P. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations 26 (1989): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520.
Pogosskii, A. Padenie zashchitnikov Sevastopolia: Kornilov, Istomin i Nakhimov, ili kratkie ocherki smerti pervykh dvukh geroev i biograficheskii ocherk poslednogo. Moscow: Tipografiia Vedomstva Moskovskoi Gorodskoi Politsii, 1856.
Protopopov, A., and S. Sovazh. Istoricheskii putevoditel’ po Sevastopoliu, edited by Major General Zaionchkovskii. St. Petersburg: Tipografiia Glavnogo upravleniia udelov, 1907.
Sibiryakov, I. “Obraz Sevastopolya dlya sovetskikh turistov: sovetskie spravochniki-putevoditeli ob osobennostyakh turisticheskikh marshrutov v Sevastopole”. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye nauki 16, no 4 (2016): 58–63. https://doi.org/10.14529/ssh160408.
Sychikova, Y., N. Tsybuliak, J. A. Teixeira da Silva, and S. Nazarovets. “GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): taksonomiia delehuvannia zavdan heneratyvnomu shtuchnomu intelektu v naukovykh doslidzhenniakh i publikatsiinii diialnostі”. In Accountability in Research. In press. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.25443316.
Uehling, G. Beyond Memory: The Crimean Tatars’ Deportation and Return. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Winter, J. Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Oleg Zubchenok
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
