Researching the 1980s competitions in Kyiv – preconditions of the After Socialist Modernism
Keywords:Postmodernism , Socialist Modernism, Kyiv, 1980s, Tafuri
The 1980s recently became a contested period in the architectural and urban planning history of Eastern Europe and the FSU countries. Situated within the Socialist Modernism timeframe, it at the same time forms a link to the manifold political and economic change happening in 1989\1991. While professionals posed radical questions about the core issues of the Socialist socio-spatial development and acquired new sensibilities towards history and locality, their influence on decision-making often remained seriously restrained by the construction industry.
In Kyiv as well as in most of the big cities of the USSR, however, a change in the approach towards areas in the city center was visible – competitions, discussions, and iterative design were becoming a new norm for the architects and planners. In this paper, three projects on the block scale are reviewed in detail. These chosen competition projects became the watershed between modernist and after-modernist approaches to planning, showcasing new contextualized spatial solutions. What standards had been formed and what were the long-term impacts on the planning processes are the issues given the first attempt to answer. The intention of this paper is to gain a better understanding of the recent past towards intensifying the discourse about the sources of the present of urban development in Kyiv and beyond.
Svystunov, Oleksandr. (2021) Liudy postiino proty novoi zabudovy, bo ne rozumiiut i ne znaiut, shcho naspravdi buduvatymut poruch [People are constantly against the new construction, because they do not understand and do not know what will actually be built nearby]. Livyi Bereh, accessed 19.12.2021 https://lb.ua/news/2021/12/17/501105_golovniy_arhitektor_kiieva_lyudi.html
Zhuk, Sergiy. (2017) Pro pryvilei ukrainskykh i moskovskykh radianskykh istorykiv, pro dnipropetrovsk, pro istoriiu brezhnievskoho periodu i pro te, chomu ukrainski istoryky ne staly radianskymy revizionistamy [About privileges of Ukrainian and Russian historians…]. historians.in.ua, accessed 19.12.2021 http://www.historians.in.ua/index.php/en/intervyu/2193-interv-yu-z-sergiem-zhukom-pro-privileji-ukrajinskikh-i-moskovskikh-radyanskikh-istorikiv-pro-dnipropetrovsk-pro-istoriyu-brezhnevskogo-periodu-i-pro-te-chomu-ukrajinski-istoriki-ne-stali-radyanskimi-revizionistami
Ezhov, Valentyn. (2002) Polveka hlazamy arkhytektora [Half a century through the eyes of an architect]. Kyiv: NYYTAH
Kalnytskyi, Mykhailo & Suvorov, Vsevolod. (2007) Kyivproekt, 70 rokiv [KYIVPROEKT, 70 years]. Kyiv: A+C
Erofalov-Pylypchak, Borys. (2010) Arkhitektura Sovetskogo Kieva [Architecture of the Soviet Kiev]. Kyiv: A+C.
Erofalov-Pylypchak, Borys. (2017) Malenkaia revoliutsyia ili 4kvartala na Podole [Small revolution or 4blocks in Podil] Kyiv: A+C, 3-4, 45-72
Kilesso, Serhei. (1983) Kak budet rekonstruyrovatsia Kreshchatyk [How the Khreschatyk will be reconstructed], Stroitelstvo y arkhitektura. 7, 5-12
Kilesso, Serhei. (1988) Rekonstruktsyia tsentralnykh kvartalov Kyeva [reconstruction of the blocks in the center of Kiev] 1, 30-37
Kosenko, Serhei. (1972) Rekonstruktsyia raiona ulyts Krasnoarmeiskoi-Gorkoho-Bozhenko v Kieve [Reconstruction of the area of Krasnoarmeyskaya - Horkoho - Bozhenko streets in Kyiv]. Stroitelstvo i arkhitektura. 9, 1-10.
Avksentyev, Valentyn. (1985) Kogda novoe neobhodimo [When the new is needed]. Stroitelstvo i arkhitektura. 7, 9-12.
Rozenberg, Viktor. (1987) Tri zhylykh kvartala kievskogo Podola [3 housing blocks in the Podil in Kyiv] Architektura SSSR, 3, 36-41.
Markhin, Valentyn. (1988). Preemstvennost` v Razvitii [Сontinuity in evolution]. Stroitel’stvo i Arkhitektura, 4, 14-18.
Lositskiy, Yuriy & Vlasova Tatyana. (1991) Kievskiy Podol – Evolutsia Tzennostey [Kyiv`s Podol – an evolution of values]. Architektura SSSR, 1-2, 26–31.
Alekseyeva, Anna. (2019). Everyday Soviet Utopias: Planning, Design and the Aesthetics of Developed Socialism: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351019781
Anderson, Richard. (2018). The retro problem: Modernism and postmodernism in the USSR. In Vladimir Kulić (Ed.), Second World Postmodernisms. Architecture and Society under Late Socialism. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350014459.0006
Bocharnikova, Daria, & Harris, Steven E. (2017). Second World Urbanity: Infrastructures of Utopia and Really Existing Socialism. Journal of Urban History, 44(1), 3-8. doi:10.1177/0096144217710227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144217710227
Cubbin, Tom. (2016). Postmodern Propaganda? Semiotics, environment and the historical turn in Soviet design 1972–1985. Journal of Design History. doi:10.1093/jdh/epw028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epw028
Ellin, Nan. (1999). Postmodern urbanism: Princeton Architectural Press.
Keyvanian, Carla. (2000). Manfredo Tafuri: From the Critique of Ideology to Microhistories. Design Issues, 16(1), 3-15. doi:10.1162/074793600300159646 %J Design Issues DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/074793600300159646
Kozlov, Denis. (2001). The Historical Turn in Late Soviet Culture: Retrospectivism, Factography, Doubt, 1953–91. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2(3), 577-600. doi:10.1353/kri.2008.0097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2008.0097
Kulic, Vladimir. (2019). Second World Postmodernisms: Architecture and Society Under Late Socialism: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350014459
Palermo, Pier Carlo, & Ponzini, Davide. (2010). Spatial planning and urban development: Critical perspectives (Vol. 10): Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8870-3
Peters, Benjamin. (2016). How not to network a nation: The uneasy history of the Soviet Internet: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034180.001.0001
Reinhold, Martin (2010). Utopias ghost. Architecture and postmodernism DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816669622.001.0001
again. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Roubal, Petr. (2018). The crisis of Modern Urbanism under the Socialist rule. The case study of the Prague planning between 1960s and 1980s. Czech Journal of Contemporary History, 6, 100-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51134/sod.2017.017
Spencer, Douglas. (2021). Critique of Architecture. In Critique of Architecture: Birkhäuser. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035621648
Stanek, Łukasz. (2012). Introduction: the ‘Second World's’ architecture and planning in the ‘Third World’. The Journal of Architecture, 17(3), 299-307. doi:10.1080/13602365.2012.692597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2012.692597
Tafuri, Manfredo. (1976). Architecture and utopia : design and capitalist development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Vidler, Anthony. (2018). Theories in and of History. Retrieved from https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/history-theory/225183/theories-in-and-of-history/
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Oleksandr Anisimov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.