Researching the 1980s competitions in Kyiv – preconditions of the After Socialist Modernism

Authors

  • Oleksandr Anisimov NGO “Understanding Soviet Podil”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/mics2022.01.110

Keywords:

Postmodernism , Socialist Modernism, Kyiv, 1980s, Tafuri

Abstract

The 1980s recently became a contested period in the architectural and urban planning history of Eastern Europe and the FSU countries. Situated within the Socialist Modernism timeframe, it at the same time forms a link to the manifold political and economic change happening in 1989\1991. While professionals posed radical questions about the core issues of the Socialist socio-spatial development and acquired new sensibilities towards history and locality, their influence on decision-making often remained seriously restrained by the construction industry.
In Kyiv as well as in most of the big cities of the USSR, however, a change in the approach towards areas in the city center was visible – competitions, discussions, and iterative design were becoming a new norm for the architects and planners. In this paper, three projects on the block scale are reviewed in detail. These chosen competition projects became the watershed between modernist and after-modernist approaches to planning, showcasing new contextualized spatial solutions. What standards had been formed and what were the long-term impacts on the planning processes are the issues given the first attempt to answer. The intention of this paper is to gain a better understanding of the recent past towards intensifying the discourse about the sources of the present of urban development in Kyiv and beyond.

References

Svystunov, Oleksandr. (2021) Liudy postiino proty novoi zabudovy, bo ne rozumiiut i ne znaiut, shcho naspravdi buduvatymut poruch [People are constantly against the new construction, because they do not understand and do not know what will actually be built nearby]. Livyi Bereh, accessed 19.12.2021 https://lb.ua/news/2021/12/17/501105_golovniy_arhitektor_kiieva_lyudi.html

Zhuk, Sergiy. (2017) Pro pryvilei ukrainskykh i moskovskykh radianskykh istorykiv, pro dnipropetrovsk, pro istoriiu brezhnievskoho periodu i pro te, chomu ukrainski istoryky ne staly radianskymy revizionistamy [About privileges of Ukrainian and Russian historians…]. historians.in.ua, accessed 19.12.2021 http://www.historians.in.ua/index.php/en/intervyu/2193-interv-yu-z-sergiem-zhukom-pro-privileji-ukrajinskikh-i-moskovskikh-radyanskikh-istorikiv-pro-dnipropetrovsk-pro-istoriyu-brezhnevskogo-periodu-i-pro-te-chomu-ukrajinski-istoriki-ne-stali-radyanskimi-revizionistami

Ezhov, Valentyn. (2002) Polveka hlazamy arkhytektora [Half a century through the eyes of an architect]. Kyiv: NYYTAH

Kalnytskyi, Mykhailo & Suvorov, Vsevolod. (2007) Kyivproekt, 70 rokiv [KYIVPROEKT, 70 years]. Kyiv: A+C

Erofalov-Pylypchak, Borys. (2010) Arkhitektura Sovetskogo Kieva [Architecture of the Soviet Kiev]. Kyiv: A+C.

Erofalov-Pylypchak, Borys. (2017) Malenkaia revoliutsyia ili 4kvartala na Podole [Small revolution or 4blocks in Podil] Kyiv: A+C, 3-4, 45-72

Kilesso, Serhei. (1983) Kak budet rekonstruyrovatsia Kreshchatyk [How the Khreschatyk will be reconstructed], Stroitelstvo y arkhitektura. 7, 5-12

Kilesso, Serhei. (1988) Rekonstruktsyia tsentralnykh kvartalov Kyeva [reconstruction of the blocks in the center of Kiev] 1, 30-37

Kosenko, Serhei. (1972) Rekonstruktsyia raiona ulyts Krasnoarmeiskoi-Gorkoho-Bozhenko v Kieve [Reconstruction of the area of Krasnoarmeyskaya - Horkoho - Bozhenko streets in Kyiv]. Stroitelstvo i arkhitektura. 9, 1-10.

Avksentyev, Valentyn. (1985) Kogda novoe neobhodimo [When the new is needed]. Stroitelstvo i arkhitektura. 7, 9-12.

Rozenberg, Viktor. (1987) Tri zhylykh kvartala kievskogo Podola [3 housing blocks in the Podil in Kyiv] Architektura SSSR, 3, 36-41.

Markhin, Valentyn. (1988). Preemstvennost` v Razvitii [Сontinuity in evolution]. Stroitel’stvo i Arkhitektura, 4, 14-18.

Lositskiy, Yuriy & Vlasova Tatyana. (1991) Kievskiy Podol – Evolutsia Tzennostey [Kyiv`s Podol – an evolution of values]. Architektura SSSR, 1-2, 26–31.

Alekseyeva, Anna. (2019). Everyday Soviet Utopias: Planning, Design and the Aesthetics of Developed Socialism: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351019781

Anderson, Richard. (2018). The retro problem: Modernism and postmodernism in the USSR. In Vladimir Kulić (Ed.), Second World Postmodernisms. Architecture and Society under Late Socialism. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350014459.0006

Bocharnikova, Daria, & Harris, Steven E. (2017). Second World Urbanity: Infrastructures of Utopia and Really Existing Socialism. Journal of Urban History, 44(1), 3-8. doi:10.1177/0096144217710227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144217710227

Cubbin, Tom. (2016). Postmodern Propaganda? Semiotics, environment and the historical turn in Soviet design 1972–1985. Journal of Design History. doi:10.1093/jdh/epw028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epw028

Ellin, Nan. (1999). Postmodern urbanism: Princeton Architectural Press.

Keyvanian, Carla. (2000). Manfredo Tafuri: From the Critique of Ideology to Microhistories. Design Issues, 16(1), 3-15. doi:10.1162/074793600300159646 %J Design Issues DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/074793600300159646

Kozlov, Denis. (2001). The Historical Turn in Late Soviet Culture: Retrospectivism, Factography, Doubt, 1953–91. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2(3), 577-600. doi:10.1353/kri.2008.0097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2008.0097

Kulic, Vladimir. (2019). Second World Postmodernisms: Architecture and Society Under Late Socialism: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350014459

Palermo, Pier Carlo, & Ponzini, Davide. (2010). Spatial planning and urban development: Critical perspectives (Vol. 10): Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8870-3

Peters, Benjamin. (2016). How not to network a nation: The uneasy history of the Soviet Internet: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034180.001.0001

Reinhold, Martin (2010). Utopias ghost. Architecture and postmodernism DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816669622.001.0001

again. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Roubal, Petr. (2018). The crisis of Modern Urbanism under the Socialist rule. The case study of the Prague planning between 1960s and 1980s. Czech Journal of Contemporary History, 6, 100-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51134/sod.2017.017

Spencer, Douglas. (2021). Critique of Architecture. In Critique of Architecture: Birkhäuser. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035621648

Stanek, Łukasz. (2012). Introduction: the ‘Second World's’ architecture and planning in the ‘Third World’. The Journal of Architecture, 17(3), 299-307. doi:10.1080/13602365.2012.692597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2012.692597

Tafuri, Manfredo. (1976). Architecture and utopia : design and capitalist development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Vidler, Anthony. (2018). Theories in and of History. Retrieved from https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/history-theory/225183/theories-in-and-of-history/

Downloads

Published

2022-07-19 — Updated on 2022-07-19

How to Cite

Anisimov, O. . (2022). Researching the 1980s competitions in Kyiv – preconditions of the After Socialist Modernism. City: History, Culture, Society, (1 (13), 110–194. https://doi.org/10.15407/mics2022.01.110

Issue

Section

Kyiv on the edge of the times. Architecture, self-governing and urban planning